Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://41.89.96.81:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2464
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOgoma, M.O.-
dc.contributor.authorKirui, B.K.-
dc.contributor.authorObwoyere1, G.O.-
dc.contributor.authorObura, E.O.-
dc.contributor.authorOtachi, E.O.-
dc.date.issued2019-08-
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-27T07:44:08Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-27T07:44:08Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://41.89.96.81:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2464-
dc.description.abstractLake Turkanafishery consists of 12 commerciallyexploited species andisthe second largest producer of freshwater fish in Kenya.Itsupportslivelihoods of approx.300,000 people locally.The lake is managed by beachmanagement units (BMU) through a co-management arrangementbetweenthegovernment and stakeholders.Despite this, itfacesmanagement relatedchallengesthathaveresultedinplummeting fish production due touncontrolled fishing effort,increased competition among fishermenanddeficientstatisticsto supportmanagement objectives.This studyassessed thecapacity of BMUs in implementing fisheries co-managementpolicybydescribingfunding sourcesand usage,trainingand skills development,equipmentownershipandlevelof understanding of BMU laws andregulations.A cross-sectionalstudy wasadoptedand purposive samplingused to collect datafrom 693 respondentsusing questionnaires.Chi squarewasused to test forsignificanceofassociationsbetween variablesat95%significant levelusingMINITAB statisticalsoftware.Results showed thatresource mobilization was statistically significant (x2=154.098, df=21,p<0.001)withdonors(45%) contributingmostfundscompared to nationalgovernment (21%), county government (19%) and well wishers (15%).Mainrevenue sources were membership registration (41%)and daily landing fees(25%).Revenue was used to purchase fishing gears (47%), supported welfareactivities(18%)whilesignificant portion (35%) was sharedbymembers.Members’ training was statistically significant (x2=79.510, df=14,p<0.001)but only 35%wereeffectively trained while 65%hadcontrary opinion.Memberswere trainedon fish handling (49%), BMU laws (28%)and micro-credit (23%) but keytraining gapsincludeddata collection, conflicts 30Ogoma et al., (2019)Egerton J. Sci. & Technol. Volume 17:29-49ISSN No. 2073-8277resolution and sea surveillance/patrols.BMUs ownedequipment;however,87%werepoorly servicedwhileotherswerenotavailable.BMUperformance could be improved mainly by providing financial support(27%), capacity building (19%) and securityto fishermen (17%).This studyidentifiedcritical capacityfactors influencingBMUoperations.Thefactorsshould be enhancedbyvarious stakeholders tosupportBMU performanceandpromotecollaborative management of fisheries resources in LakeTurkana.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipWe thankTransformingAfrican Agricultural Universities to MeaningfullyContribute to Africa’s Growth and Development (TAGDev) programme EgertonUniversityen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEgerton Universityen_US
dc.subjectBeach Managementen_US
dc.titleFactors influencing Capacity of Beach Management Units in Implementing Fisheries Co-Management in Lake Turkana, Kenyaen_US
dc.typeOtheren_US
Appears in Collections:Egerton Journal of Science and Technology

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Factors influencing Capacity of Beach Management.pdf233.04 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.